Brexit and British International Student Recruitment

I have recently been reading a book with a vivid title, Unleashing Demons.[i] The author is Craig Oliver, and the subject is the referendum on whether to remain a member of the European Union or to leave it. Oliver (knighted in 2016) was Director of Politics and Communications to the Prime Minister, then David Cameron, and he analyses how the government lost the case for Remain, giving a month by month account of the inside Brexit story. It was Cameron himself who, when asked to sum up the argument against holding a referendum, proclaimed: “You could unleash demons of which you know not”. And indeed the issue has proved to be extraordinarily toxic for the British body politic.

The two main issues became the economy versus immigration — which of course at present includes students. The government thought that concentrating on the economy would win hearts and minds since it directly impacted upon people’s personal finances, but instead the “disengaged” faction chose migration over the economy, and many used the opportunity to vote Leave against the government’s preferred policy of Remain; in many cases, this was a protest statement against all that they disliked about UK and European politics. Government members did point out the economic consequences of Brexit, but were accused of having promoted “Project Fear” in their campaign. When they lost, they greatly regretted that they had not squarely counter-accused their opponents of “Project Lie”. And indeed Leavers made many mendacious claims of which the most memorable one is probably that Leave would liberate £350 million per week that could be spent on the National Health Service. Concrete facts in relation to Brexit were scarce and often contested. In the interests of freedom of speech, the media often allowed politicians’ claims to be asserted without guiding the public on how to interpret them and without ensuring that misrepresentations were corrected.

After the failure of the Remain campaign, government officials regretted that they had not attended more to the plight of universities. Sajid Javid, then Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, worried that universities would be “in chaos, not knowing what the situation is around foreign students”. Globally, the UK is the second most important location for international study (after the USA). The following points are important.

  • International students are now worth £25 million to the economy, and numbers are expected to rise between the present and 2018-19.[i] However, after the Brexit vote, there was a 7% drop in applications from EU students – the first for a decade; the University of Cambridge recorded a 14% drop in undergraduate courses alone. Students from outside the European Union make up 60% of entrants to postgraduate full-time taught Master’s degrees. Applications from China are sustaining the sectoral rise: the share of Chinese full-time Master’s students increased from 12 to 26 per cent, while the proportion from other non-EU countries declined from 42 to 34 per cent.[ii] The decline in EU students means a loss of cultural diversity, and the UK’s decision to Leave may cause negative sentiment among potential EU students by making them feel unwelcome.
  • The government imposed immigration caps and believed that there were about 100,000 migrants in the UK who should not be here. It has resolutely refused to exempt students from the cap, despite their value to the economy, and despite their contribution to the “soft power” of the UK.  Ironically, a recent report from the Office for National Statistics reveals that about 97% of international students do leave the UK when they have finished their studies, so the figures about illegal and excessive student immigration have been exposed as utterly erroneous. Disinformation is still present, and the government is slow to respond to evidence that disconfirms its prejudices. A Migration Advisory Committee is due to report, but not until 2018.
  • Theresa May, when Home Secretary, wanted to make it tough for international students to gain a visa. Compliance with the visa regime is complicated and expensive for the universities who have to bear the cost burden amounting to millions of pounds sterling.
  • At present, students from EU countries have the right to study on the same terms financially as UK nationals, and are eligible for student loans. This may change after Brexit, though the Treasury has underwritten the continuation of such loans at least for those within the system at present. A study by HEPI and London Economics[iii] indicates that any further crackdown on such students will seriously damage higher education institutions and the whole British economy.

Higher education was an important part of the Brexit debate and in retrospect, members of the Remain campaign regretted that they had not devoted more attention to it. Craig Oliver in Unleashing Demons, describes how the Prime Minister felt he was walking a tightrope when dealing with immigration; he was really troubled by the skirmishes in relation to it, publicly even “tripping over his lines on the ‘tens of thousands’ migration target” when questioned by David Dimbleby. Oliver concludes (page 394): “There will come a moment where the current Prime Minister is faced by the irresistible force of those who want complete control of immigration and an end to free movement, and the immoveable object of business and the vast majority of MPs that supported Remain, who demand as much access to the single market as possible.

Both cannot happen.

Compromise is inevitable.”

Universities will be caught in the crossfire.

[i] Oliver, C. (2016) Unleashing Demons: the Inside Story of Brexit. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

[i] “ International Students now worth £25 billion to UK economy.” Accessed on 5.11.2017 from—new-research.aspx

[ii] Accessed on 5.11.2017 from

  1. Conlon, G., Ladher, R. and Halterback, M. (12.1.2017) “The Determinants of International Demand for UK Higher Education.” Banbury: HEPI (Higher Education Policy Institute).

Enhance – Inclusion and Diversity Management (IDM)

The Yerevan communiqué (2015) as well as subsequent national strategies on the social dimension encourage European Higher Educations Institutions (HEIs) to provide inclusive systems for previously under-represented student groups. The aim is to widen access to university and to improve the outcomes for a more diverse range of applicants (e.g. disabled students, students with different national/ethnic/cultural/ linguistic backgrounds, and students with differing levels of maturity or prior work experience). Read more

Higher education branding as a “sea of sameness” demands actions by higher education leadership and management

Organizational identity has received immense attention from a number of stakeholders (Bess & Dee, 2012; Stenstaker, 2015). An outgrowth of this attention can directly be tied to efforts to brand institutional activities (Wæraas & Solbakk, 2009). National and international competition has been a catalyst for branding in higher education (Stensaker, 2007). Therefore, managerial strategies such as marketing and branding have become a priority to higher education institutions (HEIs) in order to create an identity advantage at the national, regional, and international levels.

Read more

Benchmarking Higher Education System Performance

The role of higher education is vital to our societies. Higher education contributes to human capital formation, to innovation and to the wider economic, social, cultural and environmental development.

As a result, higher education is rapidly expanding. Participation and attainment is increasing, the number of higher education institutions is growing and the sector serves a more diverse body of students. In addition, higher education is becoming increasingly global.

The sustained growth of higher education reflects its benefits. There are large incentives for individuals to obtain higher education qualifications. On average, higher education graduates have better labour market outcomes, they earn more than other workers, and individuals gain significant private returns on their investment in higher education. Read more

Research, policy and practice

The mission of EAIR is to be a European society with an international membership and view. It aims to strengthen the interaction between researchers, policy makers and practitioners. It seeks to be a professional and attractive partner to other associations in Europe and beyond, working in similar areas of higher education.

The research and development programmes of the European Union, especially the Erasmus+ programme and Horizon 2020, are policy-based programmes that implement the Europe 2020 Strategy. These programmes aim to create innovations using the participating organisations from various Member States or Partner Countries of the European Union. Innovations are based on novel ideas that are applied in practice to create new or improved processes, services or products. Read more

Bridging the hybridity between academics and administrators

For decades, universities have been described as hybrid organizations where different types of employees (read: academics and administrators) lead completely separate lives, both have their own niches and work interests. Compared to the corporate world, they would not be able to formulate future-proof strategies and respond to the ‘needs’ of contemporary society. Within the walls of the university, it is ‘an organized anarchy’ in which decision-making processes can be defined as ‘garbage can’. Several researchers (and good ones at that) have, in recent years, expressed themselves in such terms about the university as an organization.

Despite such criticisms, academic organizations have proven able to respond to an ever more rapidly changing world for hundreds of years. Universities continue to prove their added value, and they are perfectly able to demonstrate their public value. Universities adapt to the environment, change a little bit, but remain unchanged in their core. Read more

The EAIR that I breathe

Our association “The Higher Education Society” is in healthy shape. Reaching the age of maturity – EAIR will celebrate its 40th birthday in 2018 – we can look back at forums, well organised by enthusiastic and professional university teams, with great keynote speakers, many interesting contributions from participants and our members and interesting new initiatives, like the presidential roundtable and the special interest groups. An asset of our association is that the forums bring us to new places, leads to reacquainting old friends and introduces us to new colleagues. The size of the conference is manageable for each participant, with limited fears of getting lost in the crowd. Focusing on the period I chaired the Executive Committee, I look back with fond memories at the forums in e.g. Stavanger and Birmingham: before heading off to these forums, I did not realise what treasures these universities and their cities and regions would harbor and afterwards I was happy having met new interesting colleagues.

Read more

Cutting the cost of higher education wins few votes

Here in the UK we are in the first week into our first conservative government for 18 years. What can our European colleagues possibly learn from the political pledges that have led up to this and what are the early predications for tertiary higher education in UK? If we start by looking at the party manifestos we can get a sense of party/electorate priorities for Higher Education and possible developments in the UK and beyond over next five years. Read more


The question is clear, a tad facetious, and always current; the answer is nothing short of a challenge. After 36 years of existence, some organizations are long in the tooth, others find ways to constantly re-invent themselves. EAIR is not immune to the question: If EAIR did not exist, what difference would it make to members, non-members, and other stakeholders?  What we know for sure is that a company that does not cater products or services tailored to its customers is doomed to self-inflicted euthanasia. A little bit of fear is rarely a bad motivator. What we also know is that the field of knowledge and learning is neither entirely similar to nor different from private enterprise. We, as a community, have been gullible at times, hanging our hats on fads imported from the private sector that had little traction in educational institutions (think of TQM and re-engineering as examples). Read more